Featured
Following
5 hours ago•••
Do you still use Google for search?
If so, is it less now with all the AIs we have?
6 hours ago•••
Mom is visiting.
Let me see if I can get her on nostr 😊
11 hours ago•••
11 hours ago•••
I am finally done with the “other things” I had to work on since 2011.
I’m back. Let’s see, what’s this issue about block size?
15 hours ago•••
What are the best tools to combine various LLMs in a pipeline? Feed the output of one as the input of the other?
17 hours ago•••
turns out that the thing boiling the oceans was not bitcoin, but bitcoiners vibe-coding stuff
21 hours ago•••
Day 69 of saying good morning to Ross until he replies back.
GM Ross! GM nostr!
Nice
23 hours ago•••
Years ago, I read a book that I still think about regularly. Unfortunately, I had forgotten its title and couldn't find it again despite an intensive search. Enter grok. Grok found it for me with two searches. The book is called "Holy Fire" and was written by Bruce Sterling.
When I read it back then, I wasn't a Bitcoiner yet. But since that changed, I've been reminded of one aspect of this book more often. It's set in a medium-term future on Earth, where there are very wealthy elderly people. However, the majority of the population lives on money given to them so they can satisfy basic needs. The important distinction is that there are two different types of money: the valuable money that the elderly, wealthy people possess. And then the money that is given to the population to buy things like rent, food and clothing. But with this inferior money you can't, for example acquire land, buildings or other capital.
Through my journey down the Bitcoin path, I can easily imagine all of this as a possible, realistic future.
#book #future #money
25 hours ago•••
i'm not ready for april fools
47 hours ago•••
The best time to buy Bitcoin was 15 years ago. The second-best time is now.
So there is a second-best... 🤔
Get #Bitcoin.
23 days ago•••
Ich habe kürzlich in einem Podcast gehört, dass der Sprecher davon ausgeht, dass höchstens 10-15 Prozent der Menschheit in Zukunft bitcoin in self custody halten würden. Das ist eine realistische Möglichkeit. Als Bitcoiner dachte ich mir zuerst, dass das nicht gut ist. Jetzt ist mir jedoch aufgefallen, dass selbst wenn nur ein kleiner Teil seine bitcoin selbst verwahrt, es dennoch besser ist als jede Alternative (bisher). Denn es ist verlgeichbar mit dem Gold-Standard insofern, dass die geldausgebenden Institutionen einen Rahmen haben, den sie nicht ausweiten können. Ich meine damit, dass selbst während eines "echten" Gold-Standards, die meisten Menschen nicht direkt mit Gold zu tun hatten. Die Besonderheit ist, dass sie jeder Zeit die Möglichkeit dazu gehabt hätten. Und das ist bei Bitcoin genau so.
======
I recently heard in a podcast that the speaker believes that at most 10-15 percent of humanity would hold bitcoin in self-custody in the future. That is a realistic possibility. As a Bitcoiner, I thought at first that this was not good. But now I have realized that even if only a small part holds their bitcoin themselves, it is still better than any alternative (so far). Because it is comparable to the gold standard in that the money-issuing institutions have a framework that they cannot expand. What I mean by that is that even during a "real" gold standard, most people did not have direct contact with gold. The special thing is that they would have had the opportunity to do so at any time. And that is exactly the case with Bitcoin.
Get #Bitcoin.
#custody #gold
LOAD OLDER THREADS