#Attakai npub1dhlcccehejvc2sac4qqg5fz2p60t9fa2meq26yw3mury2zv4ny6q76rnre

Se servir de la puissance de calcul #bitcoin pour chauffer une pièce 🌡️

Rendu possible grâce au projet #attakai 👏 ✊👏

Plus d’info ici: https://planb.network/tutorials/mining/attakai

Bon ça y est je rattrape le retard avec les #traductions en #francais du @bitcoinoptech ,

@bitschmidty vient de valider 3 d'entre-elles, bonne lecture

Un grand merci à @murchandamus et @bitcoinpointfr pour leur soutien

bitcoinops.org/fr/newsletters

C'est aussi la fin de la série de l'été sur la politique de relai des transactions #Bitcoin    , comment fonctionne les taux de frais, le mempool, à quoi ça sert ...

Passionnant !

J'apprends énormément grâce à ça j'espère que vous aussi !

Racontez moi

Un truc est sûr avec #Bitcoin    c'est que tous ceux qui s'investissent dedans reçoivent un accueil incroyable.

Quand je vois le nombre de conneries que je fais sur GitHub à chaque PR, jamais je n'ai reçu une critique, que des conseils pour faire mieux, voir même de l'aide.

@bitschmidty et @murchandamus perdent un temps incroyable de ma faute, mais sans jamais une remarque, un reproche ... Ils me corrigent, me guident, m'aident...

Just thank you for your support 🙏

Et je ne vous parle même pas de @bitcoinpointfr qui à chaque fois que je lui demande relis, corrige les coquilles, améliore le texte pour en faire ce que vous lisez chaque semaine (enfin quand je ne fais pas trop de fautes 😅)

Merci merci merci 🙏

On ne croirait pas mais juste une traduction d'article hebdo ça prend du temps et de l'énergie à au moins 3-4 personnes.

Mon estimation serait d'environ 6 à 7h de travail pour ça, et ce n'est que la traduction ! 🤯

Pensez maintenant à ceux qui l'écrivent ...

Et encore plus à tous ceux qui font la matière pour ces informations, des cerveaux en ébullition constante pour imaginer comment améliorer ce système Des personnes un peu partout sur terre qui chacun dans leur coin propose à l'ensemble, qui en discute et avance par consensus

Aucune autorité centrale, aucun chef, aucune fondation attachée pour inciter vers telle ou telle direction, non.

Juste le consensus, l'intelligence collective, l'ouverture d'esprit et le respect mutuel même dans les désaccords...

#Respect

#nostrfr #bitcoin

4 years ago.

Support the network effects you want to see in the world

#nostr

Gm,

There are 378 days left until the Bitcoin halving.

Les ami(e)s le meetup de la @CitadelleVr c'est toujours tous les Samedis à 21h30 dans la #BitcoinCyberCity

La nouveauté, c'est que maintenant vous pouvez nous rejoindre depuis votre téléphone ou PC sans rien installer auparavant. Et vous pouvez toujours venir en #VR aussi !

Et voila le lien pour rejoindre la ville !

GN friends 💜

New @ZEUS loading animation is lit 🔥⚡

"Anyone who understands economics and finance and how markets work will be a maximalist because it is more efficient to have one currency than a bunch of ones." —Peter Todd

Can we call a 21k zap a hadouken?

The best bitcoin developers have not been born yet.

The most innovative uses of Bitcoin have not been conceived yet.

I don’t make the rules, just here to remind y’all.

'The Lightning Network' Does Not Exist

- Many people refer to the aggregate of all lightning channels as 'The Lightning Network' but this is a false premise. There is no singular 'Lightning Network' but rather many payment channels between distinct peers, some connected with each other and some not.

- Lightning as an interoperable payment protocol between professional custodians seems to have found solid product market fit. Expect significant volume, adoption, and usage going forward.

- Lightning as a robust sovereign payment protocol has yet to be battle tested. Heavy reliance on Tor, which has had massive reliability issues, the friction of active liquidity management, and lack of strong privacy guarantees put it at risk.

A Cypherpunk's Manifesto Eric Hughes

March 9, 1993

Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy. A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world.

If two parties have some sort of dealings, then each has a memory of their interaction. Each party can speak about their own memory of this; how could anyone prevent it? One could pass laws against it, but the freedom of speech, even more than privacy, is fundamental to an open society; we seek not to restrict any speech at all. If many parties speak together in the same forum, each can speak to all the others and aggregate together knowledge about individuals and other parties. The power of electronic communications has enabled such group speech, and it will not go away merely because we might want it to.

Since we desire privacy, we must ensure that each party to a transaction have knowledge only of that which is directly necessary for that transaction. Since any information can be spoken of, we must ensure that we reveal as little as possible. In most cases personal identity is not salient. When I purchase a magazine at a store and hand cash to the clerk, there is no need to know who I am. When I ask my electronic mail provider to send and receive messages, my provider need not know to whom I am speaking or what I am saying or what others are saying to me; my provider only need know how to get the message there and how much I owe them in fees. When my identity is revealed by the underlying mechanism of the transaction, I have no privacy. I cannot here selectively reveal myself; I must always reveal myself.

Therefore, privacy in an open society requires anonymous transaction systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system. An anonymous transaction system is not a secret transaction system. An anonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when desired and only when desired; this is the essence of privacy.

Privacy in an open society also requires cryptography. If I say something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it. If the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no privacy. To encrypt is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to encrypt with weak cryptography is to indicate not too much desire for privacy. Furthermore, to reveal one's identity with assurance when the default is anonymity requires the cryptographic signature.

We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless organizations to grant us privacy out of their beneficence. It is to their advantage to speak of us, and we should expect that they will speak. To try to prevent their speech is to fight against the realities of information. Information does not just want to be free, it longs to be free. Information expands to fill the available storage space. Information is Rumor's younger, stronger cousin; Information is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and understands less than Rumor.

We must defend our own privacy if we expect to have any. We must come together and create systems which allow anonymous transactions to take place. People have been defending their own privacy for centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret handshakes, and couriers. The technologies of the past did not allow for strong privacy, but electronic technologies do.

We the Cypherpunks are dedicated to building anonymous systems. We are defending our privacy with cryptography, with anonymous mail forwarding systems, with digital signatures, and with electronic money.

Cypherpunks write code. We know that someone has to write software to defend privacy, and since we can't get privacy unless we all do, we're going to write it. We publish our code so that our fellow Cypherpunks may practice and play with it. Our code is free for all to use, worldwide. We don't much care if you don't approve of the software we write. We know that software can't be destroyed and that a widely dispersed system can't be shut down.

Cypherpunks deplore regulations on cryptography, for encryption is fundamentally a private act. The act of encryption, in fact, removes information from the public realm. Even laws against cryptography reach only so far as a nation's border and the arm of its violence. Cryptography will ineluctably spread over the whole globe, and with it the anonymous transactions systems that it makes possible.

For privacy to be widespread it must be part of a social contract. People must come and together deploy these systems for the common good. Privacy only extends so far as the cooperation of one's fellows in society. We the Cypherpunks seek your questions and your concerns and hope we may engage you so that we do not deceive ourselves. We will not, however, be moved out of our course because some may disagree with our goals.

The Cypherpunks are actively engaged in making the networks safer for privacy. Let us proceed together apace.

Onward.